Fraud Upon California Courts  frauduponcacourt.net

HOME PAGE

PARTIES INVOLVED

ISSUES IN THIS CASE

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

COURT RECORDS

MORE EVIDENCE FOR FRAUD

NEW  FILINGS

PRESS RELEASES

CA Supreme Court decisions

NEWS

PROPOSITION

WANTED

Los Angeles County files Motion-
-Does not want Judge to decide the Fraud

1) April 11 2006          ·DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE AND DISMISS THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS FROM THE PLAINTIFF IN THE AMOUNT OF $720.00 PURSUANT TO C.C.P.§ 128.5; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTORITIES; DECLARATION OF AMBER A. LOGAN  

       

2) April 11 2006  ·
        DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO STRIKE AND DISMISS THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT  

       

3) April 12 2006  ·
        RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST BY LOS ANGELES TO STRIKE. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DOES NOT WANT JUDGE PAUL GUTMAN TO LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE ON FRAUD ON THE COURT. TO DATE, THE JUDGE HAS BEEN ALLOWING THE COUNTY TO FALSIFY EVIDENCE AND DOES NOT WANT TO LOOK AT IT.  

 

 

Contact us

Contact Anant Kumar Tripati (102081) at:
ASPC - Tucson Manzanita
P.O. Box 24401
Tucson, AZ 85734-4401
or email tripati(at)sbcglobal(dot)net   or    LAfraud(at)gmail(dot)com

Anant Kumar Tripati is the sole person responsible for the content of this website.   All content © Copyright 2012
frauduponcacourt.net
All Rights Reserved Worldwide
Owner: Anant K. Tripati